Description
COA-BACKED BOTANICAL INGREDIENT
Coffea L. Fruit Extract
Green Coffee Bean Extract Powder 50% is presented for B2B ingredient qualification using representative batch evidence and batch-specific analytical language.

COA-Backed Specification
| Botanical identity | Coffea L. |
|---|---|
| Plant part | Fruit |
| Form and colour | Fine yellow-brown powder |
| Assay | HPLC assay >=50%; result 52.8% |
| Particle size | 98% through 80 mesh |
| Loss on drying | <=5.0%; result 4.45% |
| Ash | <=5.0%; result 3.85% |
| Representative batch | LXLK220303 |
| Manufacture date | 3 March 2022 |
| Shelf life | Two years when stored properly |
Representative values do not replace the current shipment COA.

Buyer Decision Guide
Compare this standardised grade by HPLC assay >=50%; result 52.8%, the stated method and the offered-lot result; raw material and ratio extracts are different purchasing specifications.
- Evaluation sample typically 10-20 g
- Regular MOQ typically 1 kg
- Typical lead time 7-15 working days

How This Grade Differs
Green Coffee Bean Extract Powder 50% is qualified using botanical identity: Coffea L.; plant part: Fruit; offered grade: HPLC assay >=50%; result 52.8%. Its purchasing definition is anchored to HPLC assay >=50%; result 52.8%; alternatives must be compared on marker target and analytical basis.
Compare these related grades before approval:
For a substitution review, compare botanical identity, plant part, assay target, analytical method, physical form and the current offered-batch COA.
Quality and Documentation
Representative batch LXLK220303 supports the specification table above. Use the cited record for preliminary comparison and request the offered-lot COA for final technical approval.
Green Coffee Bean Extract Powder 50% Qualification Snapshot
This snapshot is taken from the specification evidence displayed on this page. Confirm that the quotation, specification and current offered-batch COA describe the same grade before approval.
| Botanical identity | Coffea L. |
|---|---|
| Plant part | Fruit |
| Assay | HPLC assay >=50%; result 52.8% |
| Particle size | 98% through 80 mesh |
| Loss on drying | <=5.0%; result 4.45% |
Three Checks Before Ordering
- Match botanical identity and plant part.
- Match assay target, unit and analytical method.
- Review the current batch data and destination-market documents.
Continue with Standardized Botanical Extracts, the COA review checklist, or the specification comparison guide.
Frequently Asked Questions
What specification defines Green Coffee Bean Extract Powder 50%?
For Green Coffee Bean Extract Powder 50%: HPLC assay >=50%; result 52.8%.
What source identity defines this ingredient?
For Green Coffee Bean Extract Powder 50%: Match Coffea L., Fruit across the quotation, specification and offered-batch COA. The differentiating target is HPLC assay >=50%; result 52.8%; confirm the marker, unit and stated analytical basis.
How should the representative batch be interpreted?
For Green Coffee Bean Extract Powder 50%: The page cites representative batch LXLK220303. Final approval requires the current lot's identity, specification results and relevant dates.
Can the shipment batch be documented separately?
For Green Coffee Bean Extract Powder 50%: Current batch documentation should be reviewed before purchase; a representative document is useful for screening but does not release a shipment.
How should product and contaminant tests be reviewed?
For Green Coffee Bean Extract Powder 50%: Do not assess HPLC assay >=50%; result 52.8% in isolation; particle size, moisture or drying data and market-relevant safety limits can also affect acceptance.
When should MOQ be reconfirmed?
For Green Coffee Bean Extract Powder 50%: Confirm MOQ and timing on the live quotation because stock position, testing, packing and destination requirements can change both.
Which customisation requests require technical review?
For Green Coffee Bean Extract Powder 50%: Alternative packing or selected parameters may be considered case by case, subject to production feasibility and a revised written specification.





Reviews
There are no reviews yet.